According to Keyamo, the position of ‘Minister of State’ is deemed unconstitutional. He argues that the constitution does not recognize or provide for such a position within the government structure. Keyamo believes that the existence of ‘Ministers of State’ infringes upon the principles of separation of powers and the proper delineation of responsibilities within the executive branch.
Keyamo contends that the Constitution clearly outlines the positions of ministers and their respective duties, without any provision for a subordinate ‘Minister of State’ role. He argues that the appointment of ‘Ministers of State’ undermines the constitutional framework and creates confusion regarding the hierarchy and accountability of government officials.
Furthermore, Keyamo highlights concerns about the allocation of resources and responsibilities within the ministries. He believes that the presence of ‘Ministers of State’ can lead to a duplication of roles and functions, resulting in inefficiency and a lack of clear leadership.
Overall, Keyamo’s assertion aims to challenge the constitutionality of the ‘Minister of State’ position and provoke a reevaluation of the government’s structure to ensure adherence to constitutional principles and enhance effective governance.
