King Charles III, he becomes the symbolic head of state of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth of Nations.
The role of the monarch in modern Britain is largely ceremonial, with most political power held by the elected government. Nonetheless, the monarch retains an important symbolic role in the country and the Commonwealth, representing national unity and continuity. The monarch also has important constitutional duties, such as appointing the prime minister, granting royal assent to laws passed by parliament, and serving as commander-in-chief of the armed forces.
King Charles III is expected to continue in this role, upholding the traditions and values of the British monarchy while also adapting to the changing needs and expectations of modern society. He would also be expected to use his position to promote national unity, foster international relations, and support charitable causes and initiatives.
Overall, while the role of the monarch in modern Britain is largely symbolic, King Charles III would still be an important figurehead representing the country and the Commonwealth(Many African countries), and fulfilling important constitutional duties.
Many African countries gained their independence from colonial powers in the mid-twentieth century, and have since struggled to build their own political systems and identities. Some leaders argue that continued ties to the British monarchy, such as the requirement for Commonwealth countries to swear allegiance to the Queen, undermine these efforts and perpetuate a legacy of colonialism.
Nonetheless, some African leaders maintain close ties to the British monarchy, such as the formal President of Kenya, Uhuru Kenyatta, who is the son of Kenya’s first president, Jomo Kenyatta, who was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II in 1970. Other African leaders have criticized the monarchy for its lack of diversity and representation, particularly in light of the Black Lives Matter movement and growing demands for social justice and equality around the world.
Overall, views on the British monarchy among African leaders are complex and diverse, reflecting a range of historical, political, and cultural factors. While some leaders continue to value the monarchy as an important symbol of tradition and unity, others criticize it as a symbol of ongoing political and economic domination, and call for greater diversity and representation in the institution.
The reasons why Africa does not value the monarchy anymore are complex and multifaceted. One reason is historical. Many African countries were colonized by European powers, including Britain, and were ruled by monarchs or other European royalty. This legacy of colonialism and imperialism has left a lasting negative impression on many Africans, who associate the monarchy with the exploitation and oppression of their ancestors.
Another reason is the changing values and priorities of African societies. Many African countries have undergone significant social, economic, and political transformations since gaining independence. The monarchy may no longer be seen as relevant or necessary in modern African societies.
Additionally, the monarchy is often viewed as a symbol of privilege and elitism, which is incompatible with African values of egalitarianism and social justice. Many African countries have embraced democratic values and principles, and the monarchy may be seen as antithetical to these values.
Finally, the monarchy may be seen as irrelevant to the daily struggles and challenges faced by many Africans, such as poverty, disease, and political instability. As such, many Africans may not see the value or relevance of the monarchy in their lives.
Overall, the reasons why Africa does not value the monarchy are complex and varied. They reflect both historical and contemporary factors, as well as changing values and priorities in African societies.
J.U Osuagwu Msc. PhD student
